On 10 November 2026, a Luxembourg company pays its fourth advance of municipal business tax and its fourth advance of net wealth tax. On 10 December, it pays its fourth advance of corporate income tax. These two dates close the 2026 tax year. The amounts do not depend on the 2026 result: they depend on the most recent assessment issued by the Administration des contributions directes (ACD), Luxembourg's direct tax authority.
For a holding company whose result swings from one year to the next (a disposal, non-exempt dividends, a provision release), the gap between what is called and what will be due can reach several hundred thousand euros, in either direction. That gap is often discovered when the assessment arrives, although it could have been measured as early as October — and that is exactly what doo.FINANCE builds into its clients' financial steering. Here is how Luxembourg tax advances work, what they represent at the end of 2026, and what a finance director can still do before the deadlines.
Tax advances in Luxembourg: three taxes, two calendars
A resident company pays quarterly advances, over the tax year, on three taxes that are later assessed. Their calendars do not coincide, and this is the first source of error in a cash plan:
| Tax | Advance due dates | 4th advance 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| Corporate income tax (IRC, impôt sur le revenu des collectivités) | 10 March, 10 June, 10 September, 10 December | 10 December 2026 |
| Municipal business tax (ICC, impôt commercial communal) | 10 February, 10 May, 10 August, 10 November | 10 November 2026 |
| Net wealth tax (IF, impôt sur la fortune) for companies | 10 February, 10 May, 10 August, 10 November | 10 November 2026 |
IRC comes with the employment fund surcharge (fonds pour l'emploi), set at 7% of IRC: it follows IRC and its due dates.
The ACD tax calendar describes the 10 November and 10 December payments as those of "tax year N". For 2026, these are therefore the last instalments on the current year, not a 2025 balance.
How the amount is set, and why it can be wrong
According to the ACD, each advance is set "in principle, at one quarter of the tax which, after crediting withholding taxes, results from the most recently issued assessment". Two consequences follow.
The reference year is not 2026
The most recently issued assessment is the last notice received. Depending on the tax office's progress, it may relate to 2024, or to an even earlier year. 2026 advances therefore reflect that year's result, at that year's rates.
The rates have in fact changed. Since tax year 2025, IRC is 16% above €200,000 of taxable income (14% up to €175,000, with a transition band in between). It was 17% from 2019 to 2024. For a company established in Luxembourg City, the nominal combined rate of IRC, ICC and employment fund surcharge thus falls from 24.94% to 23.87%. An advance based on a 2024 assessment carries the old rate.
The reference year's result is not 2026's
This second effect weighs more. A holding company that realised a taxable capital gain in 2024 and only earns recurring income in 2026 pays 2026 advances calibrated on an exceptional year. The reverse also happens: a very profitable 2026, with advances based on a lean year, builds up a large balance payable on assessment.
The ACD provides for this: the amount "is modified, either upon a reasoned request from the taxpayer, or ex officio" when the authority holds information justifying a reduction or an increase. Adjustment therefore works both ways. The gap still has to be measured first.
A worked example: the holding company that sold in 2024
Take a SOPARFI with its registered office in Luxembourg City. Its last assessment relates to 2024, with taxable income of €1,200,000 driven by a non-exempt capital gain on a disposal. For 2026, its forecast result is €400,000. The example is simplified: ICC base identical to the IRC base, no allowance, no credit or tax relief.
What the 2024 assessment calls in 2026:
- IRC 2024: 17% × €1,200,000 = €204,000, plus the employment fund surcharge (7%): €14,280, i.e. €218,280 in total, so €54,570 per quarter;
- ICC 2024: 6.75% × €1,200,000 = €81,000, i.e. €20,250 per quarter.
What will actually be due for 2026:
- IRC 2026: 16% × €400,000 = €64,000, plus the employment fund surcharge: €4,480, i.e. €68,480;
- ICC 2026: 6.75% × €400,000 = €27,000.
The total 2026 charge (€95,480) does correspond to 23.87% of taxable income. But if all four advances are paid as called, the company will have paid €299,280 for a tax of €95,480. It will therefore have tied up €203,800 until the 2026 assessment, which will not be issued before 2027 at the earliest.
At this point in the year, three ICC advances and three IRC advances have already gone out. Even if the last two were reduced to zero, the overpayment would remain €95,230 on IRC and €33,750 on ICC. What is still in play are the last two payments: €74,820.
The reverse case. With the same 2024 assessment and 2026 taxable income of €3,000,000, 2026 tax would reach €513,600 of IRC (employment fund surcharge included) and €202,500 of ICC. The advances cover only €299,280 of it. The balance of €416,820 will be payable on assessment. It bears no interest until the assessment falls due, but it must sit in the forecast, and an ex officio increase of the advances remains possible if the ACD holds the information.
Net wealth tax: the line that gets forgotten
The 10 November advance also includes net wealth tax, which follows a different logic. It is 0.5% of taxable net wealth up to €500 million. For a holding company whose assets are mainly financial, the minimum often applies. Since tax year 2025, the minimum net wealth tax for resident taxpayers is:
- €535 when total assets are less than or equal to €350,000;
- €1,605 between €350,000 and €2,000,000;
- €4,815 above €2,000,000.
This minimum is reduced by the IRC, employment fund surcharge included, due for the preceding tax year. A holding company that paid significant IRC the previous year may therefore see its minimum neutralised, then the effect reverse the following year. The mechanism is the same as for IRC: the advance called reflects a past situation, and its relevance is checked, not assumed.
